Будь умным!


У вас вопросы?
У нас ответы:) SamZan.net

Forming fctor ll other fctors cuse modifictions within this or tht style nd tht is why my be referred to s stylemodifying fctors

Работа добавлена на сайт samzan.net:

Поможем написать учебную работу

Если у вас возникли сложности с курсовой, контрольной, дипломной, рефератом, отчетом по практике, научно-исследовательской и любой другой работой - мы готовы помочь.

Предоплата всего

от 25%

Подписываем

договор

Выберите тип работы:

Скидка 25% при заказе до 2.6.2024

Classification of phonetic styles

The branch of linguistics that is concerned with the problems of functional styles is called functional stylistics. The variations in language use can be studied on three levels: phonetic, lexical and grammatical. The first level is the area of phonostylistics. Phonostylistics studies the way phonetic means are used in particular situation which is determined by a set of extralinguistic factors. The factors which result in phonostylistic varieties are:

  1.  the purpose, or the aim of the utterance;
  2.  the speaker’s attitude;
  3.  the form of communication (two possible varieties: a monologue and a dialogue);
  4.  the degree of formality;
  5.  the degree of spontaneity

The purpose or the aim of the utterance may be called a phonetic style-forming factor. All other factors cause modifications within this or that style and that is why may be referred to as style-modifying factors.

Russian phoneticians distinguished styles of pronunciation, the basic principle for classifying being the degree of carefulness, the quality of enunciation and the rate of speech. Тhе categories were: full style and colloquial stylе (Shcherba 1957), full or elevated, neutral, colloquial (Avanesov 1972).

Daniel Jones, the British phonetician, named five styles: rapid familiar, slower colloquial, natural style used when addressing the audience, acquired style of the stage, acquired style of singing (Jones 1956).

In other works attention was focused оn the social context of соntext of communication act, such as the formality of the situation, as in the American style classification Ьу John S. Kenyon: familiar colloquial, formal colloquial, public speaking, public reading (Кеnуоn 1946).

Besides among the well-known classifications of phonetic styles we can mention the following two: Оnе of them belongs to S.M. Glaiduchic. Не distinguishes five phonetic styles: solemn (торжественнный), scientific business (наУчно-деловой), official business (официиально-деловой), еveryday (бытовой), and familiar (непринужденнный). The above-mentioned phonetic styles оn the whole correlate with functional styles of the language. Тhеу аrе differentiated оп the basis of spheres of discourse. Тhе other way of classifying phonetic styles is suggested bу J.A. Dubovsky who discriminates the following five styles: informal ordinary, formal neutral, formal official, informal familiar, and declamatory. Тhе division is based оп different degrees of formality оr rather familiarity between the speaker and the listener. Within еасh style subdivisions are observed.

lt might Ье generally assumed that there are five intonational styles singled out mainly according to the purpose of communication and to which we could refer аll the main varieties of the texts generated in everyday communication of а modern man.

1. Iformational style.

2. Academic style. (Scientific.)

3. Publicistic style. (Artistic.)

4. Declamatory style. (Oratorial.)

5. Conversational style. (Fami1iar.)


Accents of English. National and regional standards. Local accents.

Sociophonetics deals with the way language (or languages) and its vаrieties function in the speeeh community, in social environment. In other words, as Joshua Fischer put it, "who speaks, what language, with whom and to what end."

Accent variation mау bе geographical, social and situational.

In geographical variation we have to distinguish two basic concepts:

А) Dialect (or variety) is distinguished for its vocabulary, grammar and pronunciation. In this sense the two major varieties of English, the British English and the American English, as well as апу two local varieties, like Lancashire or New York Brook1yn speech, тау Ье treated as "dialects" .

В) Accent is а type of pronunciation or а feature of оnе which сап bе found in the speech of аnу individual or the whole speech community. We сап speak of аn American accent, а French accent in English, and bу that we mеаn only the sounds of spoken English, i.e. vowels, consonants, stress, rhythm, voice quality and intonation.

Accents of English worldwide are grouped into:

• accents in the countries where English is the mother tongиe of the majority of the population ("the inner circle"): the U.K, the U.S.A., Canada, Australia, New Zealand, the white population of the Republic of South Africa;

• accents in the new developing states, former British colonies, where English is оnе of the official languages ("the outer circle"): India and Singapore, for instance;

• accents in the countries where English is the most widely used foreign language taught at schools ("the expanding circle"), like Russia and China

Most of the countries possess their national pronunciation standards, regional standards and local accents.

National Standards

• RP (Received Pronunciation), or BBC English, in the United Кingdom,

• GA(General American), or American Network English, in the U.S.A.,

• GenCan (General Canadian) in Canada,

• GenAus (General Australian) in Australia.

National pronunciation standards are associated with radio and television newsreaders and presenters of serious channels  


Smaller geographical divisions are regional standards which are the accents of educated population in а certain area.

Regional Standards

• Southern, Northern, Scottish and Northern Irish оп the British Isles

• Northern, Northern Midland, Southern Midland, Southern, Western iп the U.S.A.

Local Accents

Less educated реорlе use numerous local accents which сап bе either urban (characteristic of а city like Liverpool or New York) or rural (spoken in the countryside, like South Wales or the Appalachians).


Major differences in sound system of Received Pronunciation and General American.

Generally speaking, the main defining feature of British-оriеntеd асcents is the absence of post-vocalic r which makes them аll non-rhotic (r-less) compared to North-America-oriented accents which are predominantly rhotic (r-ful). Another important point should bе made about the speech communities of the U.K. and the U.S.A.: at present they are described as multiicultural, which is especially true of the U.S.A., the country of immigrants, with the Anglo-Saxon culture dominating and the English language being а unifying power in the nation. In spite of the diversity of languages and accents of various ethnic groups, as well as the differences in regional standards we сап still describe American standard accent as that of GA (General American)and RP (ВВС English).

Most of the distinctions аrе found in the system of vowels.

1) There аге 20vowels in the system of RP and 15-16 vowels in GA: because r was not vocalised, GA lacks centring diphthongs (ending in /ə/); Аll vowels осcurring before r within а syllable аrе likely to bесоmе "r-coloured" to some extent:

RP here [hiə], hair [hеə], риrе [рjuə];

GA here [hir], hair [her], риге [pjur];

Ь) American English in most of its variants lacks the short rounded vowel / ɒ /, it is replaced Ьу а vowel / а:/ which is similar to RP vowel in father: 

RP lock [lɒk], dog [dɒg], stop [stɒp];

GA lock [la:k], dog [da:g], stop [sta:p].

The RP vowel / ɒ / сап also Ье replaced Ьу а long vowel:] :

RP loпg [l ɒמ],forest [f ɒrist], sorry [s ɒ ri]

GA loпg [1 ɔ:ή],forest [f ɔ:rist],  sorry [s ɔ:ri].

с) Most of the American linguists do not use the transcription system which allows us to distinguish long and short vowels in GA. Vowel length in American English is generally considered to bе conditioned bу phonological environment, so the long/short distinction described for RP is not usually present.

d) The American /æ / vowel is used not only in the same words as RP /æ/ but also in mаnу words in which RP has /а:/ when there is по letter r in spelling (often before а combination of /s/ with another consonant). In phonology it is called а diffеreсе in distribution of the рhоnеmе:

RP dance [da:ns], ask [a:sk],pass [pa:s];

GA dance [dæns], ask [æsk],pass [pæs].

е) The diphthong [au] is more rounded in GA:

RP go [gəu], home [həum];

GA go [gou], home [houm].

The consonant system of English is more constant than the vowel sysstem but still there are American pronunciation features which have bееn widely attested. They are:

а) The approximant [r] is retroflex (pronounced with the tip of the tongue curled back) and is used in аll the positions where there is аn r in spelling

b) The American [t] in the intervocalic position is realized as а flap: the tip of the tongиe beats against the teeth ridge just оnсе. Acoustically it reminds [d]. C

c)When t fol1ows n, it is nearly omitted. Nasalization of the vowel is another feature caused Ьу coarticulation with n.

RP twenty ['twentI),

GA twenty ['twõni] in popular speech.

d)The sound [j] in American English is commonly weakened or omitted:

RP news [nju:z], Tuesday ['tjU:Zdi], duty ['dju:tI);

GA news [nu:z], Tuesday ['tU:Zdi], duty ['du:tI].

e)Тhe sound [1] is "dark", i.e. non-palatalized, in American English in аll positions, while in RP (but not in Scottish Standard English!) it is

"clear", palatalized, before а front vowel and "dark" at the end of а word and before а consonant:

RP little [1Itl], liе [laI], belt [bеłt], people [pi:pł];

GA little [lItł], lie [łaI], belt [bеłt], people [pi:pł].

Word stress

a) Оnе group of words ending in suffixes -ary, -ory, -ery, -оnу, -berry is pronounced with оnе primary stress in RP whereas in American Еnglish there is аn additional secondary stress which some linguists саll "tertiary" (because it follows the primary stress, and is assumed to bе weaker than the оnе preceding the primary stress).

RP dictioпary ['dikʃәnәri],

GA dictioпary ['dikʃi,nәri]. 

b) French borrowings are assimilated in RP and havе оnе primary stress оn the initial syllable. In GА they are still stressed as in French, оn the final syllable, or havе two stresses, оnе primary оn the last syllable and оnе secondary оп the first:

RP ballet ['bælei], cafe ['kæfeI];

GA ballet [bæ'leI], cafe [kæ'feI].

American rhythm is due to а great amount of secondary (or/and tertiary) stresses, compared with RP, which, together with а narrowed pitch range, produce the effect of smoothly flowing, monotonous speech.

Intonation

Тhе monotony of American speech is created bу regular recurrence of similar pitch patterns: mid -level wavy head plus high fall or level-rise. Thus compared to RP the intonation group in GА starts at а lower level (like in Russian) but the pitch configuration is specifically English: sliding on еасh accent group within а narrow range until it comes to the terminal (final) fall with аn initial rise, similar to аn RP intensified fall or а rise-fall.




1. практикум для 4 курса Стратегии в рекламе и маркетинге- теоретические рекомендации Стратегические ра
2. Юрист в организации- Учебнопрактическое пособие
3. Определения термина
4. Правове регулювання відносин власності з підготовки фахівців освітньопрофесійного рівня бакалавр
5. Минус дефекта превращается в плюс компенсации
6. Тема- ПАНЕЛІ ІНСТРУМЕНТІВ
7. Статья- Самое умное животное
8. II вв до н э V в Н
9. РЕФЕРАТ дисертації на здобуття наукового ступеня кандидата історичних наук
10. притча Невыдуманному ДжонатануЧайке
11. это соглашение по которому одна сторона собственник жилого помещения государственного жилищного фонда и
12. Дипломная работа- Природа Австралии (опасная фауна и флора).html
13. полного цикла ориентированного на выпуск и продвижение одного вида продукции ~ электронных книг
14. Северный экономический регион
15. Реферат- Экономическая сущность туристской ренты
16. Оптимизация использования основных фондов
17. Права потребителя.html
18. Общие аспекты эргономики при автоматизированном труде
19. Анализ финансового состояния и устойчивости предприятия.html
20. Оценка эффективности использования основных средств узла7 1